🔗 Share this article Families' Distress Regarding Coastal Erosion Threatening Norfolk Graves Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones. A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations. A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward. “At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.” Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said. Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground. “It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.” “I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.” A Soldier's Grave in Peril Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated. “It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.” She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.” Searching for Solutions and Certainty The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried. Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near. “It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.” A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.” He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.” “Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.” The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.